Legal Opinion

McPherson v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is conceded in appellee’s brief that “the burden was upon the defendant to show the easement by prescription, or adverse possession,” the defense being an affirmative one. Power Co. v. Taylor, 194 N. C., 231, 139 S. E., 381. But in this connection it is asserted that “while in disconnected excerpts, it might appear the burden of proof was improperly placed, yet a careful reading of the entire charge will show the jury could not have been misled.” Bechtel v. Weaver, 202 N. C., 856, 164 S. E., 338; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32.

We have held in a number of cases that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Virginia-Carolina Power Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Hayes v. Sells CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Bechtel v. . WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Henry v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. McCracken v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Carrow v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Williams v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API