United States v. Smith
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
BLOMMERS, Senior Judge.
The matter we face deals with interpretation of a provision contained in a recent change to the regulation governing military justice procedures in the Air Force. *738Specifically, it concerns the admissibility of evidence from an accused’s personnel records during the presentencing portion of a trial.
In this regard, previous editions of Air Force Regulation 111-1, Military Justice Guide [hereinafter referred to as AFR 111-1], provided:
During the presentencing proceedings, personnel records, or copies or summaries thereof, reflecting an accused’s past conduct and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. StrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. SaulterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. ClevelandU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. ShepherdU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. WeatherspoonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. DonohueU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. GadsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.