Krueger v. Krueger
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Oconto county: S. D. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Mary S. Erueger, a widow, having five children, and possessing about $3,500 worth of property, all personal, on March 15,1904, the day before her death, executed a will, as follows: “First. I give and bequeath to my son Albert W. Krueger three hundred dollars. “Second.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Oconto county: S. D. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Mary S. Erueger, a widow, having five children, and possessing about $3,500 worth of property, all personal, on March 15,1904, the day before her death, executed a will, as follows: “First. I give and bequeath to my son Albert W. Krueger three hundred dollars. “Second. Christian and Mary and Frederick and Annie to receive the balance of the money and mortgages belonging to me in equal shares. “Third. My horse and buggy, cutter, and cow, and harness, and all my household furniture and piano and…
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.
Tbe only questions argued in tbis court are mental competency and tbe legality of execution. These are pure questions of fact, and we find no clear preponderance of evidence against tbe findings tbereon made by tbe trial court. Indeed, not enough to so reasonably justify appellant in expectation of a favorable result upon tbe appeal tbat we should order his costs paid out-of tbe estate. Sucb being the case, we cannot overturn those findings, which fully support the judgment.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Duel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Wisconsin Town Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Calumet County Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Opinion No. Oag 46-82, (1982), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1982