Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Town Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Calumet County Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 12, 1937 :

Fairchild, J.

Mutual reinsurance would necessarily carry with it liability for an assessment, the payment of which may be enforced by an action at law. The complaint in this case sets forth all facts which must be proved to sustain a recovery, including the fact that the defendant was a member liable to assessment. The trial court was of the opinion that certain formalities required by statute had not been duly observed. A reference to the decision and the findings in the circuit court shows that the central issue is as to defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huber v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. MacLeod v. City of WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Black River Improvement Co. v. HolwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Canada-Atlantic & Plant S. S. Co. v. FlandersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  5. Krueger v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Peerless Insurance Co. v. MansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API