Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-4957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company’s motion for partial summary judgment. Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs Ruth and Elliot Harrison, the facts forming the background of the motion are as follows:

A fire destroyed plaintiffs’ home on September 15, 1980. Plaintiffs notified defendant of the loss on the day the fire occurred. Police authorities investigated the fire and determined that it was of an incendiary cause. Shortly after the fire defendant began its own investigation of the loss. Conducted by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Mason v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Edelson v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Weber v. CuetoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Paper Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Yeitrakis v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
  5. Hill v. Cray Research, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API