Legal Opinion
Meeks v. Schofield
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 2, 2015No. 14-5495PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Danny Ray Meeks, a Tennessee prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the. district court’s denial of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, Title VII of .the CM Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and the Rehabilitation Act (RA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-18. This case has been referred to a panel of the court that, upon examination, unanimously agrees that oral argument is-not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In 2012, Meeks filed a complaint against Tennessee Department of Corrections…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Grinter v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Aguilar v. BackDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Alexander v. HoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Annabel 414234 v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Bailey v. Board of Commissioners of the Louisiana Stadium and Exposition DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Brian Lumbus v. Steve Weishar, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.