Legal Opinion

Hill v. Sterchi Bros. Stores Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 24, 1934No. 23869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. A paragraph in an affidavit of illegality setting up that two of the three conditional-sale contracts sued on “have been satisfied by payment in full of all sums due plaintiff thereunder,” sets up a plea of payment as to such contracts, good as against an oral motion to strike, made at the trial term, which is equivalent to a general demurrer. Baer v. Christian, 83 Ga. 322 (9 S. E. 790) ; Epstein v. Thomas, 15 Ga. App. 741 (3) (84 S. E. 201) ; Register v. Southern States Phos. Co., 157 Ga. 561 (4) (122 S. E. 323) ; Robbins v. Calhoun National Bank, 46 Ga. App. 489 (2) (168 S. E. 116).

2. No…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Young v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Indiana Truck Corp. v. GlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Mauldin v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Kennesaw Guano Co. v. Miles & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Register v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Long Tobacco Harvesting Co. v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Mechanics Loan & Savings Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Reynolds v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Sumner v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API