Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. Gainey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 1914No. 5641PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Action on contract; from city court of Cairo—Judge Singletary. February 28, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

According to the allegations of the petition, Gainey and others made a written contract with Mauldin Brothers (alleged to be a firm composed of J. L. Mauldin and C. E. Mauldin) to plant ten acres in collards for seed, and to sell the seed obtained from the ten acres' to Mauldin Brothers at 20 cents' per pound *354“í. o. b. nearest railroad station.” Mauldin Brothers were to furnish sacks to hold the seed, and the growers, as parties of the second part, agreed to see that the seed were “well cleaned and in merchantable condition.” The petition further alleged that the plaintiffs tendered 6,650…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Bowden v. AchorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Lamar v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Hall v. WallerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Groover v. Tattnall Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Prothro v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API