Legal Opinion

Mignatti v. General Mortgage Financing Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1936No. Appeal, 386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an attachment execution. The trial judge gave binding instructions for the garnishee. From the judgment entered in its favor plaintiff appeals.

If all the facts referred to by appellant are recited, the case would seem a quite complicated one. We think it can be so outlined as to appear simple when viewed with the controlling principles of law in mind.

Mignatti, the plaintiff, was the owner of a tract of land which he desired to develop by building houses. He applied to the General Mortgage Financing Corporation, the defendant, for a mortgage loan to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Fisher for Use v. McFarlandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Folmar v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Bianco v. Concepts" 100", Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Converse v. Hawse (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. DeShong v. Cody, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1964
  5. Roach v. Nilson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API