Legal Opinion

Converse v. Hawse (Et Al.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1937No. Appeal, 61PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is a foreign attachment proceeding, and the matter to be decided is, whether the fund in the hands of the garnishee, Doylestown Trust Company, should go to the plaintiff, under his attachment, or, to Cora M. Peck, as the result of certain writings, signed by the defendant, Hawse. Plaintiff had entered judgment against Hawse. The jury found in favor of the garnishee, the effect of which was to determine that the fund belonged to Cora M. Peck. The court entered judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of plaintiff and against the garnishee. The garnishee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  2. Bair v. Snyder County State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Brubaker v. LauverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Cumberland County v. Lemoyne Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Duffy v. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine & General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In Re Estate of TrbovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Gribbel v. GribbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine & General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Nace v. Fulton County National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API