Nellis v. Pacific Bank
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Plaintiff sues for himself, and as assignee of certain twenty other depositors in defendant bank, to recover from its stockholders upon their statutory liability as such stockholders. Plaintiff had judgment against defendant James M. McDonald upon certain of the causes of action pleaded, but as to the causes of action assigned to plaintiff by Lewis Merrill, B. G. Ruhl & Co. and Annie White, and as to his own claim, the court gave judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment only as to the assigned claims of Merrill, Ruhl & Co., and White.
The original complaint was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Green v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Wells v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Heilbron v. HeinlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. BittickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- White v. DeeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Nesbit v. PollakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Ball v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905