Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Toledo Boiler Works Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
These two cases, involving alleged infringements of two different patents, were heard together. This was feasible because the parties were the same in each case, and, though two distinct patents are involved, they pertain to appliances in connection with water-tube boilers, and each is alleged to have been used in the same structure. The defense was anticipation, nonpatentability, and the assertion that the equitable title to the patent, if valid, is in the defendants.
*821. The patent involved in case No. 1,902 is a patent dated December 35, 1903, issued tó the Aultman &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Lamb Knit Goods Co. v. Lamb Glove & Mitten Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Woodward v. Boston Lasting Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Babcock v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Continental Wire Fence Co. v. PendergastU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Shamrock Technologies, Inc. v. Medical Sterilization, Inc., and Robert S. LuniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Rollman Mfg. Co. v. Universal Hardware WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.