Legal Opinion

Finn v. McCuen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1990No. 90-232Published

1Opinion of the Court

798 S.W.2d 34 (1990)

303 Ark. 418

John FINN, Don Elliott and Citizens Against Legalized Lottery, Petitioners,

Marcus Halbrook, Intervenor,

v.

W.J. "Bill" McCUEN, Secretary of State, Respondent,

Robert G. Walker, Winfred W. Batch, Clarence J. Rice, and Arkansans for Legalized Lottery, Intervenors.

No. 90-232.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

October 26, 1990.

Robert S. Shafer, William H. Sutton, Larry O. Page, Little Rock, for petitioners.

William R. Wilson, Little Rock, for intervenor, Halbrook.

Jeffrey A. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for respondent.

John F. Stroud, Jr., Texarkana, for intervenor,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Glaze; Dissent · Dudley; Dissent · Hays.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Gaines v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Finn v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API