Legal Opinion

Horafeus v. Mangos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1929No. Appeal 183Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff filed his bill against defendant' in the municipal court alleging that they were partners in a restaurant business and that defendant was excluding plaintiff (the details of his averments are immaterial on this appeal), and prayed, inter alia, for an injunction and for a receiver to take charge of and operate the business. At the hearing on the application for a preliminary injunction, plaintiff testified that the value of the partnership assets was $5,000, and that he valued his own share at $2,500. Defendant then (and before the time for filing an answer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Taylor v. Decatur Mineral & Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1901
  3. Rogers v. LawtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1908
  4. Pennington v. Conway and AshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API