Legal Opinion

California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1975No. Civ. 46506PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Code of Civil Procedure'section 1013 extends the time for responsive action by a party to a lawsuit served by mail with a “notice or other paper.” The case at bench involves the narrow issue of the applicability of section 1013 to extend the time of a party to move to compel further compliance with self-executing civil discovery. We conclude that by reason of the expanded definition of “notice or other paper” adopted by California decisions, section 1013 is applicable.

Petitioner, plaintiff in a pending lawsuit, served interrogatories upon real party in interest, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pesce v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Labarthe v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Sinclair v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Montgomery v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
  4. Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Tielsch v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API