Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment against it after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained and plaintiff had declined to amend. The complaint, after alleging the corporate capacity of the parties and the nature of their respective businesses, as disclosed by their corporate names, sets out, in the first count, that one of the power lines of the defendant extends from the city of Sacramento to the city of Suisun, a distance of about forty miles, over which the defendant transports normally an alternating electric current of high potentiality of about fifty-three thousand volts and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Evans v. Reading Chemical Fertilizing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United Electric Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1890
- Citizens Telephone Co. v. Fort Wayne & Springfield Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Phillippay v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Gainey v. FolkmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1953
- Hale v. Farmers Electric Membership CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- McCulloch County Electric Coop., Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.