Legal Opinion

Hale v. Farmers Electric Membership Corporation

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1940No. 4485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs (appellees) are the operators of two, single wire, grounded telephone systems operating in the counties of Curry and Quay, and have been giving telephone service to rural residents for several years.

The defendant, consisting of' some 600 farmers in said counties, are organized into-a rural electrical non-profit association and incorporated under the provisions of Chap. 100 of the N. M. Session Laws of 1937. The defendant secured a permit to construct its electric power system from the Rural Electrification Administration, a federal agency, and a loan in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Pfeiffer v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Auburn and Cato Plank Road Co. v. . DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Damon v. CarmeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gainey v. FolkmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1953
  3. United States v. BallardDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1960
  4. Martin v. SchleinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API