Legal Opinion
(PS) Shackelford v. Virtu Investments
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 3, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01601Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAWNE C. SHACKELFORD, No. 2:16-cv-1601-TLN-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VIRTU INVESTMENTS, LLC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 The court previously granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, but 18 dismissed her first amended complaint1 with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2).2 19 ECF No. 3. After receiving an extension of time (ECF No. 6), plaintiff filed a second amended 20 complaint (ECF No. 8). As explained below, the second amended complaint must…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.