Legal Opinion

State v. Rutherford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1984No. 8412SC79PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

While hitchhiking, Harold Wayne Zortman, a Fort Bragg soldier, was robbed at gunpoint. The defendants were tried and convicted by a jury of Robbery with a Firearm. An assignment of error common to both defendants’ briefs concerns whether the trial court abused its discretion by failing to declare a mistrial on the grounds that the jury was improperly influenced by contact with a State’s witness. Defendant Rutherford additionally assigns as error the entry of his conviction judgment when crucial evidence admitted against him constituted hearsay. Defendant Faust also contends…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Lewis v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API