State v. Rutherford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
While hitchhiking, Harold Wayne Zortman, a Fort Bragg soldier, was robbed at gunpoint. The defendants were tried and convicted by a jury of Robbery with a Firearm. An assignment of error common to both defendants’ briefs concerns whether the trial court abused its discretion by failing to declare a mistrial on the grounds that the jury was improperly influenced by contact with a State’s witness. Defendant Rutherford additionally assigns as error the entry of his conviction judgment when crucial evidence admitted against him constituted hearsay. Defendant Faust also contends…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Lewis v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.