Parke, Davis & Co. v. Mewhirter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county. The facts are narrated in the first paragraph of the opinion. From an order, Leary, J., dismissing the garnishment proceedings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
1. On December 24, 1920, plaintiff sued defendant and commenced garnishment proceedings. The garnishees were at that time in possession of property belonging to defendant. On January 6, an involuntary *235petition in bankruptcy was bled against defendant and on January 29, 1921, he was adjudged bankrupt and a receiver appointed. On January 31 the garnishees made their disclosure. Thereupon the receiver made application to the court, showing the adjudication of bankruptcy and his appointment as receiver, and representing that the possession of this property was withheld from the receiver by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Stone-Ordean-Wells Co. v. MarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Wildner v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- In re New England Breeders' ClubDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1910
- Donnelly v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Midwest Food PackersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Lincoln National Bank v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922