Legal Opinion

Weller v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1989No. S005856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court has recommended that petitioner Mark Walden Weller be suspended from the practice of law for five years, that the execution of suspension be stayed, and that petitioner be placed on probation on various conditions, including two years’ actual suspension. Petitioner asserts that a two-year actual suspension is unwarranted. Instead, he suggests imposition of an 18-month suspension, stayed, with no period of actual suspension.

As we shall explain, in light of the nature of petitioner’s misconduct and his past disciplinary record, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tarver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bluestein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kelly v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Libarian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Chang v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Friedman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McKnight v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kaplan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API