Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Amoco Production, Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided March 12, 2004No. 12-02-00309-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice.

Appellants William L. Dixon, Sr., his wife Georgia S. Dixon, A.W. Witcher, and his wife Betty L. Witcher bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s partial judgment that the property description in a gas unit designation (“Unit Designation”) filed by Amoco Production Company (“Amoco”) is legally sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds. 1 They contend in two issues that the legal description in the Unit Designation is insufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds and that the Unit Designation is therefore void. We affirm.

Background

On July…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Matter of HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gates v. AsherTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Greer v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Harris v. WindsorTexas Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, L.L.P. v. Old TJC Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  2. Doris Virginia McGregor Stribling, Martha Lee McGregor, and Frank Bobbitt McGregor, Jr. v. Millican Dpc Partners, Lp, and Peach Creek Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. May v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. XTO Energy Inc. v. NikolaiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Petrohawk Properties, L.P., and P-H Energy, L.L.C. v. Noel Diane Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API