Legal Opinion

Barrera v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 2004No. 1-03-1865PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MALLEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal arises from an action brought by plaintiff Doriela Barrera against the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) for injuries she allegedly sustained when she suffered from an epileptic seizure on a CTA bus and the CTA employees left her unconscious on a public sidewalk where she was robbed. The trial court granted the CTA’s motion to dismiss her cause of action on the basis that her complaint failed to describe the exact location of the accident as required under section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (Act) (70 ILCS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Murphy v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Sanders v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Yokley v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Puszkarska v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. White v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API