Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This Wunderlich Act suit was referred to Trial Commissioner Louis Spector for preparation and filing of his opinion and recommended conclusion of law. The commissioner has done so in a report dated February 25, 1970. The Government has requested review. The plaintiff supports the commissioner’s report. The case has been submitted to the judges on oral argument and briefs. We agree with Commissioner Spector.
Wholly apart from the Suspension of Work clause, it is established that under the Changes and…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by26 opinions
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- DeMatteo Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Law v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Beauchamp Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.