Legal Opinion

City of Miami Beach v. State ex rel. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 1959No. 58-715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Counsel for the appellee heretofore filed in this cause a motion to require the City of Miami Beach to post a supersedeas bond in order for the appellant-city to stay the effect of a peremptory writ of mandamus issued to said city in the circuit court. *600Thereupon this court entered its order filed December 14, 1958, allowing said motion to be withdrawn and provided for the acceleration of the appeal.

Upon the filing of briefs and the cause having been set for oral argument in accordance with the acceleration and the agreement of both parties to the appeal, the opinion and judgment of this court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. In Re PrevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  5. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PC Lissenden Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Couse v. Canal AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  3. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc. v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API