Francis v. Barry
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Pealer, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendant beings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for a breach of contract made by the defendant with the plaintiff, by which he agreed to sell and convey to her a cer*312tain store property situated in the village of Schoolcraft, in' the county of Kalamazoo, Michigan, for the consideration of $2,500, — $2,000 to be paid down in cash, and the balance by her note of $500, to be paid by the rent of the store as it accrued, at the rate at which it was being rented, to wit, $400 per year, and which was payable in monthly install-' ments.
The declaration sets up that the contract is in writing, and consists…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. MountcastleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Chicago & Paducah RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Cramer v. BallardMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Cooper v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.