Tuthill v. Katz
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; North, J. Ejectment by Rosette I. Tuthill against Frank Katz and. Frederick Katz. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of ejectment in which the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of 17.74 acres of land, more or less, being all of the northwest fractional quarter of section 15, lying between the east half of southwest quarter of section 10 and Cedar Lake, in town 3 south, of range 6 west, situate in the township of Fredonia, Calhoun county. The' plea was the general issue, with notice of special matter, that it will not be necessary to refer to specifically.
It is undisputed that as early as September, 1861, one "William Rowley was the owner of the premises in question, and that he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Stringer v. Lessee of YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Ives v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
- Russell v. SweezeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Huron Land Co. v. RobargeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stamp v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Bentley v. CamMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Savidge v. SeagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Green v. TrumbullNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.