Legal Opinion

Durham v. Callahan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1953No. 32088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an appeal by the state from an order entered after trial on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was discharged from custody.

July 21, 1951, by a special verdict under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2175, RCW 10.76.030, a jury found: (1) that Nelson Durham had committed the acts of which he was charged; (2) that he was not guilty by reason of mental irresponsibility existing at the time of the charged offenses; (3) that he was sane at the time of trial; and (4) that he was an unsafe person to be at large because of the likelihood of a relapse or recurrence of the mentally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TugasWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. DurhamWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In re TugasWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KolocotronisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. State v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. In RE NAHL v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API