Legal Opinion

State v. Tugas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1951No. 31744PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The prosecuting attorney for Yakima county seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the superior court for that county from proceeding with a jury trial for the purpose of determining whether Julian Tugas has become sane since his commitment to the criminally insane ward at the penitentiary and is not liable to a recurrence of mental unsoundness or relapse, and is a safe person to be at large.

Tugas was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity. The jury also found that he was not insane at the time of the trial, but that there was “such likelihood of a relapse or recurrence of the insane…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SaffronWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Colvin v. Sup'r Ct.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. TugasWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KolocotronisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. In RE KENSTRIP v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Durham v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. DurhamWashington Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API