Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Beam

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Troy Allen Beam appeals from the judgment of sentence, consisting of fines, imposed following his convictions on two counts each of the following summary offenses: (1) under the Dog Law, at 3 P.S. § 459-201 (“Applications for dog licenses; fees; penalties”), for failing to have his dogs properly licensed; and (2) under the Rabies Prevention and Control in Domestic Animals and Wildlife Act, at 3 P.S. § 455.8 (“Vaccination required; certificate and tag”), for failing to have his dogs properly vaccinated. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence pertaining to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. TomeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. GlumacSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. LopezCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Com. v. Smith, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. Com. v. Smith, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Gonder, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API