Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Glumac

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Appellant David Glumac brings this direct appeal from his summary criminal conviction for confinement of dogs, 3 P.S. § 459-305. Appellant received a citation for violating 3 P.S. § 459-305, was found guilty by a district justice and immediately instituted a statutory appeal for a trial de novo before the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Appellant was convicted and received a fine of $100.00 plus costs. This appeal followed. We affirm.

The following facts led to the citation. On February 15, 1997, Cindy Falk was driving her van to her mother’s home. While traveling on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Miller v. HurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Baehr v. Commonwealth ex rel. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RabanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. BeamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. RabanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Com. v. Black, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. P.J. MacolinoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API