Manett, Seastrunk & Buckner v. Terminal Building Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Commissioner LEDDY
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs in error entered into a contract with the defendant in error to do all of the electrical work required under the plans and specifications-for what is known as the Terminal Building, in the city of Dallas, for the agreed sum of $78,654.50. It was stipulated that defendant in error was given the privilege under the contract of ordering extra work, or of making any changes in the original plans and specifications; with the provision that if the value of such work or alteration was not agreed upon, it should be determined in one…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Manett-Seastrunk v. Terminal Bldg. Corp. of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bernard Johnson, Inc. v. Continental Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Beeman v. WorrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- American Surety Co. of New York v. ShawTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- State v. GentrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Salmon v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.