Legal Opinion

Manett, Seastrunk & Buckner v. Terminal Building Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1931No. 5717PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Commissioner LEDDY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiffs in error entered into a contract with the defendant in error to do all of the electrical work required under the plans and specifications-for what is known as the Terminal Building, in the city of Dallas, for the agreed sum of $78,654.50. It was stipulated that defendant in error was given the privilege under the contract of ordering extra work, or of making any changes in the original plans and specifications; with the provision that if the value of such work or alteration was not agreed upon, it should be determined in one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Manett-Seastrunk v. Terminal Bldg. Corp. of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bernard Johnson, Inc. v. Continental Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Beeman v. WorrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. American Surety Co. of New York v. ShawTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  4. State v. GentrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Salmon v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API