Coppin v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.

BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.

Among the issues raised by the appealing defendant is one challenging the propriety of certain substantive instructions given by the trial court which defendant claims was a reversible error that deprived it of a fair trial.

We agree with this contention.

I

Underlying the controversy are these un-controverted facts. In December 1982, plaintiff, Farrell Coppin, applied for insurance coverage on his Muskogee County residence through an agent of defendant Shelter Mutual Insurance Company. The two-page application which was filled in by the agent’s secretary and signed by…