Kelly v. Robertson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Blaine Couid.y: James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Thomas I<\ Robertson against W. R. Kelly. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, O.
This was an action for damages for fraud and deceit m the exchange of real estate. The plaintiff below. Thomas F. Robertson, after the formal parts of his petition, alleged that he was 34 years of age and had been totally blind for the past 30 years, and that prior to the times hereinafter alleged he had known the defendant, AV. R. Kelly, for 5 or 6 years privately and in a business way, and that during a part of that time the defendant had been president of the First National Bank of AVatonga, and the plaintiff had maintained business relations with him by way of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Garvin v. HarrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCain v. Combined Communications Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Dusbabek v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Humphrey v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Coppin v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Doerr v. HenryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.