Legal Opinion
Bieber v. City of Newcastle
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided May 28, 1965No. Civ. No. 4781PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERR, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a citizen of the state of South Dakota, brought this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered from the negligence of the city of Newcastle, Wyoming, a first class city, its mayor and city engineer, and against the owner of the property contiguous to the defective sidewalk. The case was tried to the Court, with a jury. Two verdicts were returned, the jury finding in favor of Faye Bessey, the owner of the contiguous property, and against the city of Newcastle and in favor of plaintiff, exonerating the mayor and city engineer. Damages were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Tulsa v. MacUraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Enyeart v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Opitz v. Town of NewcastleWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- O'DONNELL v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Harding v. City of Highland ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Norman v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.