Legal Opinion

City of Colorado Springs v. Timberlane Associates

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 27, 1989No. 88SC383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

On certiorari review, the City of Colorado Springs (City) challenges the court of appeals order dismissing its appeal on the ground that it was not filed in a timely manner. Because the trial court determined the City’s post-trial motion within sixty days, as required by C.R.C.P. 59(j), we reverse and remand the case to the court of appeals with directions to reinstate the appeals of the City and the respondents.

I

The City brought suit against the respondents, Timberlane Associates (Timberlane), for unpaid utility bills. The trial court granted Timberlane’s motion for summary judgment on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  2. In Re the Marriage of ForsbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golden Animal Hospital v. HortonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Fenton v. Fibreboard Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re the Marriage of ChristenColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Subsequent Injury Fund v. LadowColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Horton v. Golden Animal HospitalColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API