Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Forsberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 27, 1989No. 88SC55PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

On certiorari review, husband, Olle Fors-berg, challenges the court of appeals order dismissing his appeal on the ground that it was not filed in a timely manner. Because the trial court’s oral ruling on post-trial motions within sixty days was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of C.R.C.P. 59(j), and because the husband’s appeal was filed within forty-five days after the mailing of judgment, we remand the case to the court of appeals with directions to reinstate the husband’s appeal.

I

In this dissolution of marriage action, the trial court entered permanent orders on January 17, 1986.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  4. Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. De Arman v. ConnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United Bank of Boulder, N.A. v. BuchananColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re the Marriage of BuckColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. RatchfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re the Marriage of ChristenColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In Re the Marriage of LeBlancColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API