In Re the Marriage of Forsberg
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira
On certiorari review, husband, Olle Fors-berg, challenges the court of appeals order dismissing his appeal on the ground that it was not filed in a timely manner. Because the trial court’s oral ruling on post-trial motions within sixty days was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of C.R.C.P. 59(j), and because the husband’s appeal was filed within forty-five days after the mailing of judgment, we remand the case to the court of appeals with directions to reinstate the husband’s appeal.
I
In this dissolution of marriage action, the trial court entered permanent orders on January 17, 1986.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- De Arman v. ConnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Bank of Boulder, N.A. v. BuchananColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re the Marriage of BuckColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. RatchfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re the Marriage of ChristenColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of LeBlancColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.