Legal Opinion

The Seaboard

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 3, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit in rem for loss of cargo.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This was an action brought by the libellant, by rights of subrogation, to recover certain amounts paid by it to various shippers of goods on the steamer Seaboard for delivery at Carrabelle, Florida, in September, 1899.

- The principal facts have been agreed upon and may be stated briefly as follows:

The steamer, prior to and during September, 1899, was being run by one W. C. Taylor, as charterer under the name of the Mobile Steamship Company, as a common carrier of such freight as she might, from time to time, receive for transportation between Mobile and Carrabelle and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schooner Freeman, &C. v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Knott v. Botany MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Bergh v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  4. The GermanicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  5. Acker v. EgyptDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation v. California Spray-Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Pioneer Import Corporation v. the LafcomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Colton v. New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. Morris v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation v. California Spray-Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API