Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 18, 2007No. Civil Action H-05-3912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (JONES PLAINTIFFS)

NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge.

This commercial and tort case is presently in a unique procedural posture. There currently are thirty-five Plaintiffs who include nine original plaintiffs and numerous intervenors. Plaintiffs have divided themselves into two camps, each seeking representation by different attorneys. 1 There are several motions pending before the Court that are relevant to one of these groups.

First is a Motion for Leave to File a Fourth Amended Petition (“Motion to Amend”) [Doc. # 119], supplemented by a “Memorandum in Support” [Doc. # 127],…

2Cases cited115 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whiddon v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
  2. Petro Franchise Systems, LLC v. All American Properties, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Bradley v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API