Legal Opinion

In re Derleth

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 31, 1941No. 4423PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeNeoot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, upon various grounds hereinafter discussed, claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10 to 13, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent.

Claims 1, 2, and 10 are typical of the rejected claims and read as follows:

1. A plastic mass containing hydrating cement and fly ash.

2. A concrete comprising hydrating cement, aggregate, fly ash and water.

10. As a blended cement,' a dry mixture of Portland cement and fly ash.

The references cited are:

Fels, 1,419,665, June…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Charles H. Kroekel and Frederick A. PfaffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. Application of WalkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. Application of David BandelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of TankeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  5. Application of David BandelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API