Legal Opinion
Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 17, 2023No. 3:21-cv-09703Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DANIEL HOWARD, Case No. 21-cv-09703-JSC 5 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 6 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 7 TANIUM, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 44 Defendant. 8 9 10 Daniel Howard filed suit against his former employer, Tanium, alleging Tanium 11 fraudulently induced Plaintiff to join Tanium as an employee. Defendant moves for summary 12 judgment. After carefully reviewing the papers submitted and having had the benefit of oral 13 argument on February 16, 2023, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 14 Because Plaintiff fails…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.