Legal Opinion
Levin Metals Corp. v. Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 21, 1991No. C 84 6273 SC, C 84 6324 SC and C 85 4776 SCPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MONTROSE AND STAUFFER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CONTI, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Montrose Chemical Corporation of America (“Montrose”) and Stauffer Chemical Company (“Stauffer”), defendants in these consolidated actions, move this court for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on the issue of their liability. Claims are filed against Montrose and Stauffer under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. (“CERCLA”) for costs associated with cleanup of real property located in Richmond, California…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Wickland Oil Terminals, a California Corporation v. Asarco, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and State Lands Commission of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reading Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Otay Land Co. v. U.E. Ltd., L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Levin Metals Corp. v. Parr-Richmond Terminal Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- General Electric Company v. Aamco Transmissions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.