Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner & Jacob Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1932No. 31742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is a rule taken by the state for an additional license (occupational tax). Defendant resists the claim on the ground that:

The purpose of said rule is to force respondent to pay a wholesale license for the privilege of engaging in manufacturing; in which business respondent is also engaged. That respondent is' a manufacturer of boiled ham; purchasing pork legs, putting the raw material through a soaking and curing process, then boiling, then packing.

That it (respondent) employs considerable equipment and labor in such process; and is a manufacturer of the said product.

That the present…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. City of New Orleans v. Ernst & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. City of New Orleans v. MannessiersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. State Tax Collector v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heidelberg Central, Inc. v. Director of Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. State v. Magnolia Packing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Succession of GravoletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  4. State v. Service Galvanizing WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API