State v. Gardner & Jacob Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
This is a rule taken by the state for an additional license (occupational tax). Defendant resists the claim on the ground that:
The purpose of said rule is to force respondent to pay a wholesale license for the privilege of engaging in manufacturing; in which business respondent is also engaged. That respondent is' a manufacturer of boiled ham; purchasing pork legs, putting the raw material through a soaking and curing process, then boiling, then packing.
That it (respondent) employs considerable equipment and labor in such process; and is a manufacturer of the said product.
That the present…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- City of New Orleans v. Ernst & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- City of New Orleans v. MannessiersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- State Tax Collector v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heidelberg Central, Inc. v. Director of Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. Magnolia Packing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Succession of GravoletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- State v. Service Galvanizing WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941