Texas Employers' Ass'n v. Drummond
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentHiggins, J.
I respectfully dissent from the judgment of affirmance and here now enter the grounds of my dissent as follows:
First. A physician cannot recover for medical services rendered, unless he has complied with the statutes regulating his right to practice. Compliance therewith is a condition precedent to his right to practice, and a physician suing to recover for such service must allege and prove such compliance, and a failure to so allege in the petition subjects it to general demurrer. Swift v. Kelly, 63 Tex. Civ. App. 270, 133 S. W. 901. It is not a matter of defense but a necessary allegation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. MacKechnieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. MuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Swift v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- American Nat. Ins. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.