Legal Opinion · Dissent

Texas Employers' Ass'n v. Drummond

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1924No. 1696. [fn*]Published

1DissentHiggins, J.

I respectfully dissent from the judgment of affirmance and here now enter the grounds of my dissent as follows:

First. A physician cannot recover for medical services rendered, unless he has complied with the statutes regulating his right to practice. Compliance therewith is a condition precedent to his right to practice, and a physician suing to recover for such service must allege and prove such compliance, and a failure to so allege in the petition subjects it to general demurrer. Swift v. Kelly, 63 Tex. Civ. App. 270, 133 S. W. 901. It is not a matter of defense but a necessary allegation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. MacKechnieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. MuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Swift v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. American Nat. Ins. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API