Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Flint

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1897No. 196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. On June 3, 1892, the defendant in error commenced suit in the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the Territory of Utah for the county of Weber upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy: “ $6700. Salt Lake City, Utah, April 3, 1891..

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. On June 3, 1892, the defendant in error commenced suit in the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the Territory of Utah for the county of Weber upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy: “ $6700. Salt Lake City, Utah, April 3, 1891.. “ On or before the 23d day of April, 1892, without grace, for value received, we or either of us promise to pay to the order of Eichard Flint sixty-seven hundred dollars, negotiable and payable at Ogden, Utah, without defalcation or discount, with interest, at the rate of ten per…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer

On the face of the papers the right of the plaintiff to recover is clear. The record does not contain the entire testimony offered on the trial. It cannot, therefore, be said, even if this court were at liberty to examine the testimony, that it was not amply sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

It is alleged that the trial court erred in ruling out evidence of a conversation between Frank J. Cannon and A. H. Cannon in the absence of the plaintiff — a conversation which it was claimed induced A. H. Cannon to sign the note. The mere statement of the proposition carries its own answer.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. United States v. Vincent James FinazzoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. Watanabe MasagiHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Northern Pac. R. v. KrohneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  5. O'Connell v. MasonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API