Legal Opinion
Northern Pac. R. v. Krohne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1898No. 382PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Montana.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error was the plaintiff in an action against the Northern Pacific Railroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries received by him while crossing the tracks in the company’s yard at Livingst on, Mont. A number of tracks extended through the yard from east to west. On the north side of the tracks were the railroad machine shops, in which the plaintiff worked for the company as a machinist from June, 1888, down to January 12,1892, the dal.e of his injury. Along the south side of the yard ran a fence. The streets of the city running north…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bennett v. HarkraderSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Nelson v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Davis v. Town of FultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lesser Cotton Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Maryland ex rel. HutchisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908