Legal Opinion

United States v. Vincent James Finazzo

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1961No. 14253PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Chief Judge.

Apellant, Vincent James Finazzo, was found guilty by a jury under three counts of an indictment charging unlawful purchase, possession and sale of a quantity of narcotic drugs, in violation of Sections 4704(a) and 4705(a), Title 26 U.S.C., and Section 174, Title 21 U.S.C.A. He received a sentence of five years imprisonment under each of the three counts, said terms to run concurrently.

Appellant contends that it was prejudicial error for the District Judge to fail to give the jury a cautionary instruction regarding the testimony of an accomplice, who had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Mobil Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. United States v. Jules I. LittwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. Harold W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. BraniganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. United States v. Charles George, Jr., United States of America v. J. C. GulleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API