Marathon Finance Co. v. HHC Liquidation Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CURETON, Judge:
(Concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I concur with much of the majority opinion, but I respectfully disagree that all of the 1985 deed restrictions have been extinguished. I write separately as most of my reasoning and analysis is different from the majority.
*600I. 1983 RESTRICTIONS AND IMPLIED RECIPROCAL NEGATIVE EASEMENTS
Westin argues that it is entitled to enforce the “1983 Restrictions,” which were expressly placed on the Barony Tract in a document entitled “Declarations, Conditions, and Restrictions.” This document was executed by the Hilton Head Company (HHC), and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Turman v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rosen v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Gordon E. Gouveia, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Kathleen Sue Hiles v. Barbara TazbirCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- WBQ Partnership v. Commonwealth Department of Medical Assistance Services (In Re WBQ Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Evans v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.