In re Pers. Restraint of Arnold
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.
¶1 Eddie Dean Arnold challenges his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of RCW 9A.44.130. He argues-and the Court of Appeals agreed-that he was not required to register because his 1988 conviction of statutory rape in violation of a statute amended in 1979, was not a "sex offense" within the meaning of the current sex offender registration statute. We disagree. The prior sex offense of which Arnold was convicted meets the two critical prerequisites to a countable "sex offense" listed in former RCW 9.94A.030(46)(b) (2012): (1) that prior conviction was based on a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Colleen Reilly v. City of HarrisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Green v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Of Washington, V Mason BlairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Fed. Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Mary E. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State of Washington v. Dahndre Kavaugn WestwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- The Presbytery Of Seattle, Resps v. Jeff Schulz And Ellen Schulz, AppsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.