Legal Opinion

In re Pers. Restraint of Arnold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2018No. 94544-6PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.

¶1 Eddie Dean Arnold challenges his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of RCW 9A.44.130. He argues-and the Court of Appeals agreed-that he was not required to register because his 1988 conviction of statutory rape in violation of a statute amended in 1979, was not a "sex offense" within the meaning of the current sex offender registration statute. We disagree. The prior sex offense of which Arnold was convicted meets the two critical prerequisites to a countable "sex offense" listed in former RCW 9.94A.030(46)(b) (2012): (1) that prior conviction was based on a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Colleen Reilly v. City of HarrisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Green v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V Mason BlairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. Fed. Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Mary E. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State of Washington v. Dahndre Kavaugn WestwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. The Presbytery Of Seattle, Resps v. Jeff Schulz And Ellen Schulz, AppsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API