Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Nyquist

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 6, 1989No. CIV-1972-325CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

CURTIN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Currently pending before the court is the motion of the Buffalo Board of Education (“Board”) for funding in excess of the budget appropriation authorized by the Mayor and the Common Council (referred to collectively as “the City”) last year for the 1988-89 school year. Despite approximately nine months of litigation and strenuous efforts toward settlement, this dispute has remained unresolved. It must now be brought to a conclusion.

After carefully examining the record, the court has concluded that the Board has failed to establish that it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  3. Matter of Emerson v. . BuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  5. Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arthur v. ManchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Arthur v. ManchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API